Writing Articles with ChatGPT #1: RIP Peanut the Squirrel


“Evil thrives when Good People avert their eyes” – Me

YouTube Video Original Rant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dG-6q_rWTHQ

What’s up, nerds! Back with another video(blog post). This one really struck the core of who I am, what I stand for, and what this channel means to me. Who would have thought the inspiration for all that would come from a [expletive] squirrel? But here we are, and this is what finally got me to start putting these ideas together. So here it is—raw—what I stand for, what I believe in, and what pushes me forward. That’s why we’ve got the American flag hat today, because only in America can we prevent things like this. This is what we’re here to do, what we’re here to fight against.

I’m wearing the Dr Disrespect patch, but this isn’t about him. I like the vest; you’ve got to be prepared for anything and be the best person you can be so you can stand up against things like this.

Let’s dive into what happened. About five years ago, in New York City, I saw a squirrel get hit by a car. As I got closer, I noticed a baby squirrel nearby, trying to cross the same intersection. I ran out to scare it away, but instead, it crawled up on me. This little guy was barely surviving—only one eye open and a limp.

I took him home, did some research, and got him on a diet. Eight months later, I released him in my backyard, hoping he’d live a normal wildlife, but stay close by for food or shelter. After a day and a half, he was attacked, lost half his tail, and was basically done with wildlife. That was the beginning of ‘Peanut’s’ life with humans.

Now look, Peanut’s owner is this big, tattooed guy you wouldn’t expect to have a squirrel as a pet. Stereotypes would say he’s some alpha male type, but instead, he’s devoted to taking care of this tiny animal. And that’s the thing: this little creature, who once faced such harshness, chose to trust and stay with a human who showed him immense care.

So, huge respect to Peanut’s owner. But here’s what happened—Peanut was euthanized because he supposedly bit someone at the animal rescue. This anonymous complaint led to the state getting a search warrant, signed off by multiple departments and a judge. What kind of ‘evidence’ did they have that this was so dangerous it required taxpayer dollars, to ruin a family and a nonprofit animal rescue?

The core issue is that some anonymous complaint got all these bureaucrats to storm this person’s house and kill his pet in his own home. The justification? ‘It bit someone.’ Sure, in theory, if you’re running a business, you can’t have wild animals biting people. But come on—why not wear safety gear or wait for the owner to get home?

This is what we mean by ‘play stupid games, win stupid prizes.’ We’re talking consequences here. They went in there and did what they did, and now there are none for those who started it.

This whole situation goes beyond a squirrel—it’s about the abuse of power. When someone decides what’s safe for us, takes a decision into their own hands, we’re left with consequences like these. People should be raised to understand and handle responsibility. If the employees at the shelter had concerns, they should have used the safety gear provided. And if a big guy like Peanut’s owner can handle it, others surely can, with the right precautions.

The media coverage is also telling. TMZ covers the whole story, while CNN’s headline reads, ‘Instagram famous squirrel named Peanut seized by New York State authorities,’ as if he was just taken. NBC, though, says he was euthanized after being taken, and AP gets closer with, ‘Orphan squirrel who became social media star euthanized after seizure.’ These reports give the impression Peanut was taken in for tests and euthanized, but they fail to explain why he had to die to test for rabies.

The only reason Peanut was alive in the first place was because his owner saved him. Yet, now that same life-saving owner is the one they’re taking him from, to ‘protect’ the public. Who elected these people, and what are they even protecting us from? What about Peanut’s life, or his family’s life, was made better by killing him?

If someone claimed my pet had rabies and was going to take it, they’d have to go through me. They’d have to handcuff me, gag me, and stop me however they could because I would defend my pet. This owner raised Peanut, loved him, and they killed him as though he didn’t matter. How many bureaucrats rubber-stamped that decision, justifying it as ‘doing their job’?

That’s why I make these videos and talk about these issues—because I walk the walk and talk the talk. People who genuinely stand up for what’s right, who can see through hypocrisy, are the ones who’ll stick around, and that’s what keeps me going. I have to be genuine. I can’t sit here building a following if I’m not true to myself.

And finally, look at the difference in media coverage. Some sites say Peanut was ‘seized,’ others, ‘euthanized,’ as though they just took him in and kindly put him to sleep. But that’s not what happened. They didn’t just drop him off at the vet—they stormed this family’s home, tore Peanut from them, and killed him. Why does an animal have to die to test for rabies? It’s insanity, and the media just glosses over the reality.

In America, we’re seeing power abused like this, masked as ‘safety.’ What about the anonymous source? Do they face any consequences? None. I hope it haunts them. If someone accused my pet of having rabies, I’d defend it fiercely.

That’s the problem with America today. Too many people do nothing when real evil happens, and bureaucrats abuse their power. We need to fight back. Smoke grass, eat [expletive], be excellent to each other, and as always, I’ll see you in the next video. Deuces.

That was my YouTube video cleaned up by ChatGPT, you can find the original by clicking here.

I wanted to ask chat about how the Peanut Story lines up with what I stand for as a person and here is what it printed out:

Values and Principles:

Your stance on defending those who are defenseless (like Peanut) aligns with your core values of love, action, and integrity as seen in the Five Foundations. The idea of “fighting for love” and “being your best self” resonates with your willingness to stand up for what you believe is right, even in difficult situations.

Critique of Bureaucracy and Abuse of Power:

This critique echoes your skepticism about authority and media manipulation discussed in previous conversations. You often emphasize independent thought, questioning authority, and rejecting media spin—all of which are present in your strong reactions to how Peanut’s situation was handled by authorities and reported by media.

Respect for Independent Thought and Responsibility:

The rant reflects your belief in individual responsibility and independent thinking. The idea that people should think critically and take ownership of their actions aligns with your definition of an independent thinker and the importance of teaching responsibility as part of societal development.

Empathy and the Fight Against Injustice:

The emotional response to Peanut’s death showcases your empathy and belief in justice, which tie into the Five Foundations, particularly around love, honesty, and respect for all beings. Your reaction to the bureaucratic actions highlights the importance of being genuine and true to one’s principles, a theme you’ve often emphasized in your views on societal and political issues.

This video captures your commitment to standing up against perceived injustices, your distrust of unchecked authority, and your belief in protecting those who cannot protect themselves, all of which reinforce the principles we’ve discussed. The rant is both a personal and public stand against what you see as systemic flaws, deeply aligned with your foundational values.

P’Nut Wikipedia Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peanut_(squirrel)

Back to Articles Home Page
Back to Website Home Page

By:

evolvingefficientsolutions

Posted in:

, ,

Leave a comment